Japanese
 Home > Services > Observations > Radiosondes

Radiosondes

Overview

  Radiosondes are instruments used for meteorological observation. They are equipped with a platform of sensors that measure meteorological variables such as atmospheric pressure, temperature and humidity, and also have a radio transmitter for data communications. A thermometer and hygrometer are attached to the unit’s projecting arm, and a barometer, radio transmitter, battery and other parts are embedded in the body (a storage box made of white styrene foam or plastic). Radiosondes observe atmospheric conditions (e.g., pressure, temperature, humidity, wind direction and wind speed) up to altitudes of around 30 km from the ground suspended from weather balloons. Wind direction/velocity are monitored via balloon motion tracking. Radiosondes slowly parachute down once observation is complete.

  Upper-air observation using radiosondes is carried out daily at regular intervals worldwide (at 0900 and 2100 JST). Radiosonde observation is conducted by the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) at 16 Local Meteorological Office stations nationwide and at Showa Station in Antarctica, and on board JMA research vessels. Radiosonde data are utilized for numerical prediction models (providing basic information for weather forecasts), climate change/global environment monitoring, flight operation management and other purposes.


Radiosondes used in Japan Meteorological Agency (left:RS-06G center:RS-11G right:RS92-SGP)

Radiosondes (from left: RS-06G, RS-11G, RS92-SGP)


The balloon is launched in the hands of people (MBL: Manned Balloon Launching).

MBL: Manned Balloon Launching

ABL: Automatic Balloon Launcher

ABL: Automatic Balloon Launcher


ABL (Animation)

ABL (Animation)



Radiosonde Observation Sites

List of observation sites
Region IDStationLocation Latitude
(degree)
Longitude
(degree)
47401WakkanaiWakkanai-shi, Hokkaido 45°24.9′141°40.7′
47412SapporoSapporo-shi, Hokkaido 43°03.6′141°19.7′
47418KushiroKushiro-shi, Hokkaido 42°57.2′144°26.3′
47582AkitaAkita-shi, Akita 39°43.1′140°06.0′
47600WajimaWajima-shi, Ishikawa 37°23.5′136°53.7′
47646TatenoTsukuba-shi, Ibaraki 36°03.5′140°07.5′
47678HachijojimaHachijo-cho, Hachijojima, Tokyo 33°07.3′139°46.7′
47741MatsueMatsue-shi, Shimane 35°27.5′133°04.0′
47778ShionomisakiKushimoto-cho, Higashimuro-gun, Wakayama 33°27.1′135°45.7′
47807FukuokaFukuoka-shi, Fukuoka 33°35.0′130°23.0′
47827KagoshimaKagoshima-shi, Kagoshima 31°33.3′130°32.9′
47909Naze/Funcha-togeAmami-shi, Kagoshima 28°23.6′129°33.2′
47918IshigakijimaIshigaki-shi, Okinawa 24°20.2′124°09.8′
47945Minami-daitojimaMinami-daito-son, Shimajiri-gun, Okinawa 25°49.8′131°13.7′
47971ChichijimaOgasawara-mura, Tokyo 27°05.7′142°11.1′
47991Minami-torishimaOgasawara-mura, Tokyo 24°17.4′153°59.0′
89532ShowaShowa-Base, Antarctica -69°00.3′ 39°34.7′

Radiosonde observation network (as of September 2015)

Radiosonde observation network (as of September 2015)


Observation Data

Data at specified pressure levels

Observed Data at Specified Pressure Levels

upper air weather map

Left: partial observation data for specified pressure levels, Wakkanai, 9:00 JST, 4 May 2015
Right: weather map (500 hPa), 9:00 JST, 4 May 2015


Upper-air weather map (past 24 hours) (in Japanese)

  Upper-air stability can be evaluated using observation data from radiosondes. "Atmospheric conditions are unstable" is an all-too-common term in weather forecasting; to evaluate actual stability, emagrams can be used as described below.


Emagrams

  An emagram is a kind of graphic chart illustrating atmospheric temperature and dew point temperature in relation to atmospheric pressure. As shown in Figure 1, the horizontal axis of the chart represents temperature, and the vertical axis represents pressure. Dry adiabatic lines, wet adiabatic lines and equal saturation mixing ratio lines are represented on the chart for reference in evaluating atmospheric stability. Dry adiabatic lines represent the relationship between temperature and pressure of dry air mass, while wet adiabatic lines are for saturated air mass with water vapor. Equal saturation mixing ratio lines pass through the point where the weight of water vapor contained in saturated air is equal to that of air excluding water vapor. Atmospheric stability is evaluated by comparing observation data with these reference lines.

Emagram

Figure 1 (left) upper-air observation (radiosonde) data from Tateno, 9:00 JST, 24 September 2015
Observation temperature data are shown by the thick red line (1). The thin red dry adiabatic lines show temperature changes in the virtually lifted air mass near the ground surface. The blue line shows the dew point temperature (2), and the green line indicates humidity (3).

Figure 2 (right) emagram-based representations of atmospheric stability evaluation


  In Figure 1, the dry adiabatic (thin red) lines show the temperature change of the virtually lifted air mass near the ground surface. Atmospheric stability can be evaluated by comparing observation (thick red line) data with the reference lines.

  Comparison of the thick red line (1) and the thin red line passing through the surface temperature level at the same height shows a higher temperature for (1). This means that the temperature of the lifted air mass near the ground is lower than that of the surrounding environment. As cold air is heavier (denser) than the surrounding air, upward flow will not develop. This situation is referred to as atmospheric stability.

  Figure 2 shows a diagram of emagram-based evaluation of atmospheric stability. The appearance of observation data below dry adiabatic lines (meaning that the lifted air mass is warmer than its surroundings) indicates the development of updraft due to buoyancy. In response to this situation, the comment "The atmosphere is unstable" is made. Torrential rain and a range of other weather phenomena brought by cumulonimbus clouds are more likely to occur under these conditions. Meanwhile, if the air mass is wet, the stability of the atmosphere should be evaluated using the wet adiabatic line. Wet atmospheric conditions are more likely to be associated with instability than dry conditions.


Top